About UsWhy Choose GCG?ServicesResourcesProfilesContact UsHome

COMMENTARY

Why Should We Care About the Workers' Comp Residual Market?

October 2003

By Donald J. Pfundstein*
for New Hampshire Business Review

In March 2002 I reported on the N.H. Department of Insurance's approval of the National Council on Compensation Insurance filing. The insurance department approved an average 6.7 percent decrease in "voluntary loss costs." What this means is that the primary components of a workers' compensation premium charge were on average decreased 6.7 percent. Rates in the residual market or assigned risk pool were lowered as well. Good news? I speculated at the time that things were not quite as rosy as the reductions would lead employers to believe.

There were hidden risks in the form of accelerating medical costs, and the reversal of discounting practices by carriers. A lack of reinsurance coverage and concentration of risk issues associated with 9/11 (too many employees in a single location) were additional concerns. It also was pointed out that since loss costs changes generally lag real market direction by 18-24 months, a decrease was not necessarily indicative of what was really happening.

You already know that New Hampshire law requires employers to provide wage replacement and medical benefits for employees injured on the job. Employers generally provide this protection through the purchase of workers' compensation insurance policies or by self-funding their exposure individually or on a group basis.

An employer is participating in the voluntary market (as opposed to the residual market) when it is able to purchase workers' compensation insurance from a licensed insurance company at the rates charged in the voluntary market. However, not all employers are able to get an insurance company to provide workers' compensation insurance at the voluntary market rates. In these circumstances, employers are generally forced into the residual market.

The residual market is a mechanism established and underwritten by the insurance industry through what is known as the NCCI Residual Market Plan. Every workers' compensation insurance company that writes business in New Hampshire has to share in any operating deficit incurred by the residual market.

Each insurance company's share of the deficit is equal to the percentage of the total market that it insures in the state. For instance, if Company A writes 20 percent of the total workers' compensation insurance market in New Hampshire, Company A pays 20 percent of any operating deficit incurred in the residual market.

What is this sharing of an operating deficit all about? The residual market is designed to be self-funding. In other words, the premium charged all employers in the residual market is in the aggregate suppose to be sufficient to pay the total costs of all claims in the residual market. Any shortfall has to be picked up by all insurance companies.

So what's the big deal you might ask? Isn't that what insurance companies are suppose to do?

Every dollar that is paid by your insurance company to fund an operating deficit incurred in the residual market is a dollar that can't be used to fund your losses. You paid a premium to your insurance company, yet it is required to use a portion of your money to pay for the shortfall incurred in the residual market. This relationship between the voluntary and residual markets can get out of balance quickly if the residual market is not self-sufficient. If too much voluntary market premium is needed to pay an operating deficit in the residual market, the entire system breaks down. An economic disaster is then likely.

The solution is to charge appropriate premium levels to employers in the residual market. This way your insurance company will be able to use your premiums to pay benefits for your injured employees.

The pending NCCI filing seeks a 15.7 percent increase in the residual market rates. The goal is to assure that the residual market can operate without subsidies from the voluntary market.

The good news is that New Hampshire Insurance Commissioner Roger Sevigny is expert in workers' compensation matters. He has experienced workers' compensation staff assistance as well. I don't know what the precise increase should be. I do know that the department will try hard to get it right. That's good for all employers. A self-funding residual market will help assure the long-term stability our employers and economy need.

I am proud to say that MEMIC Indemnity Company, a New Hampshire workers' compensation insurance company licensed here and in Vermont, Connecticut and Massachusetts is a client of Gallagher, Callahan & Gartrell.

*Donald J. Pfundstein is admitted in New Hampshire.

 

Return to top of page

Return to The Pfundstein Report
Return to Government Relations Articles
Return to Firm Publications

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

You may contact Donald Pfundstein at 800-528-1181.

About Us - Why Choose GCG? - Services - Resources - Professional Profiles - Contact Us - Home